Get The Latest Live Casino Promotions
Discover Casinos
Discover Tables
Discover Providers
Discover Games
Discover Deposit Methods
Best Live Casinos
Popular In UK
Top Live Dealer Tables
Native Tables
Game Guides
Other Pages
Best Software Providers
Popular List
Best Payment Methods
Most Popular
Best Bonuses
Our Favourite Offers
Country Specific Pages
Popular List

Playtech Identified as Client Behind Black Cube Probe in Evolution Case

Posted on November 5, 2025 | 8:42 am
Evolution-Court-Filings-Detail-Playtechs-Black-Cube-Engagement

Newly-released legal filings in the Superior Court of New Jersey provide a more detailed picture of the defamation case filed by Evolution AB against Black Cube and Calcagni & Kanefsky LLP. Submitted on November 3, 2025, the documents formally identify Playtech Software Limited as the party that hired Black Cube to conduct a 2021 investigation that later prompted regulators to review Evolution — inquiries that ultimately found no wrongdoing.

The filings reveal that Playtech entered into a formal engagement with Black Cube on December 30, 2020. Under the agreement, Playtech approved an upfront payment of £400,000 and structured additional “success fees” around specific desired results. Those additional payments, according to the filings, covered £150,000 for uncovering alleged misconduct by Evolution, £175,000 for press placement in a major publication, £350,000 if a regulatory inquiry was launched, and a £500,000 payment if Evolution lost its license. A cap of £800,000 was placed on total success-based compensation.

Playtech’s then-Chief Financial Officer Andrew Smith signed the original engagement letter, though the filings note that he exited the company in 2022 and played no further part in the process after his departure.

Deposition testimony included in the court documents indicates that Playtech leadership subsequently oversaw the relationship. Black Cube founder and director Dr. Avi Yanus confirmed under oath that Chief Executive Officer Mor Weizer, Senior Vice President Daniel Polturak, Vice President of Business Development Uri Levy, and former Live Gaming CEO Edo Haitin remained involved in communications after the initial agreement was executed.

Read More

Testimony Outlines Covert Tactics and Selective Evidence

New testimony sheds light on the tactics Black Cube allegedly used while producing its 2021 report. According to Dr. Yanus’s deposition, Black Cube operatives impersonated individuals using fabricated identities and secretly recorded conversations with former Evolution staff and business associates. Roughly 20 people were targeted for outreach, he stated, but only interviews that supported the narrative in the final report were forwarded to regulators.

The filings also describe Black Cube attempts to gain access to Evolution games from restricted regions, including Iran and Sudan. Most of those efforts — according to the documents — were unsuccessful. Evidence demonstrating that Evolution’s products could not be accessed from those jurisdictions was not provided to regulators. Dr. Yanus conceded during testimony that the examples of blocked access were omitted because he considered them “irrelevant.”

Evolution’s legal brief contends that the selective use of quotes, edited video footage, and the withholding of exculpatory examples contributed to a portrayal that authorities later rejected. Both the Pennsylvania Gaming Control Board and the New Jersey Division of Gaming Enforcement reviewed the claims in 2022 and determined that the allegations against Evolution were “objectively baseless.”

Top Baccarat casinos

up to

£30

Overall Rating
92

100% up to

₹15000

Overall Rating
91

100% up to

€100

+ 50 Free Spins

Overall Rating
88
Read More

Evolution Challenges Anti-SLAPP Dismissal Request

The accompanying memorandum submitted by Evolution argues that Black Cube’s motion to dismiss the suit under New Jersey’s anti-SLAPP law should not stand. Evolution asserts that the filings support its claim that the 2021 report and publicity push were not acts of protected advocacy, but instead commercially motivated efforts intended to damage the company’s standing and competitive position within the gaming sector.

Playtech’s role first became public earlier in 2025, after court orders required disclosure of the client behind the investigation. The latest filings build significantly on that earlier revelation by including sworn testimony and documentation tying Playtech directly to the commissioning of the project and outlining the financial structure that incentivized the creation and distribution of the report.

The matter remains active in New Jersey’s Superior Court system. Based on the current schedule and scope of pending issues, legal proceedings are expected to continue well into 2026 as both sides prepare for the next stage of litigation.

Source:

“Evolution Court Filings Detail Playtech’s Black Cube Engagement“. lcb.org. November 4, 2025.

Read More