According to Brisbane Times, the inquiry conducted by former Supreme Court Justice Patricia Bergin, SC, is to commence public hearings on February 24 having the same powers as a royal commission. However, Melco disputed this in court rejecting to deliver nine documents requested as evidence due to their coverage by legal professional privilege.
Last Tuesday, NSW Supreme Court Justice Christine Adamson ruled in favor of Melco concluding that the wording of the Casino Control Act did not make it clear that Parliament envisioned the legislation to override the right of lawyer-client confidentiality.
Explaining her decision...
...she mentioned "substantial risk" that parliament did not grasp the full extent of all the possible consequences of empowering a gaming regulator inquiry with the powers of a royal commission. She also said that if parliament aimed to make it possible for ILGA inquiries to override the common law right of lawyer-client confidentiality, then "it was obliged to make its intention clear."
Commenting on the verdict, ILGA said it was considering the court judgment and the way “it may impact the running of the inquiry.“ In his turn, the NWS government spokesman stated that NSW Attorney-General Mark Speakman is going to appeal the decision of the court. He added: "Given the matter will return before the court, any further comment at this stage would be inappropriate.“
Meanwhile, counsel assisting Adam Bell, SC, disclosed on the opening day of hearings last month that it had already received 58,000 documents in response to 45 summonses, even though the NSW inquiry's ability to access privileged information is still uncertain. He also confirmed the inquiry is planning to call both Mr. Parker and Melco boss Lawrence Ho to take the stand.