Among the suggested measures are also “tighter restrictions and warnings on video games that include micro-transactions,” which means age-related restrictions can be extended even to non-random loot. Anyway, despite the report’s advisory nature and the absence of actions taken to bring it into force, the identification of loot boxes as a form of gambling is a significant step forward for opponents of microtransactions.
All in all, plenty of details...
...regarding age verification procedures are still to be developed. For instance, the Committee notes that the National Consumer Protection Framework for online betting is currently under review, with the intention to reduce the timeframe for customers’ identity checks from 14 days to 72 hours. Hopefully, future actions focused on customer protection will also contribute to the better player experience.
In conclusion, the Committee expressed its understanding that the subject of age verification “requires further review, research and development in order to be implemented effectively as part of a multi-faceted and layered approach to online safety.“
The report also highlighted the importance of a comprehensive approach as lack of adequate research may lead to raising risks and “unintended consequences around data security, trust, privacy and freedom of expression.“
Source: “Protecting the age of innocence report“. Australian Parliament. February 2020.